Energy

Energy investment opportunities that can drive Sustainable Development Goals

Guest post by Alan Sproule
Executive Director of Project Export Finance, Standard Charter Bank
Originally published on BizCommunity website in June, 2020

 
 

The term 'crisis' is used all too frequently but unfortunately it is often accurate, whether it's the Covid-19 global pandemic affecting us all or socio-economic crises that impact individual countries. The World Economic Forum reports that just recently, when business leaders were asked to identify the biggest risks of the coming decade, climate change was high on the list. Now that we are all faced with the immediate humanitarian crisis as a result of Covid-19, which has also quickly developed into an economic crisis, it is important that we don't lose sight of the longer term risk that climate change poses to humankind.

The United Nations' (UN)17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are among the most ambitious projects humanity has ever attempted. They represent our best hope of tackling the most serious challenges facing our societies and our planet. The investment required to meet the targets by 2030 cannot be provided by governments and NGOs alone. The private sector has a critical role to play if we are, collectively, to achieve them.

While many investors, corporations and financial institutions say they are committed to achieving the goals, capital is not flowing at the required speed to the countries where SDG investment matters most. In emerging markets alone, the UN estimates $3.9trn per year will be required to reach all 17 goals by 2030. At the current rate of investment, the UN has calculated a gap of $2.5trn per year.

SDG 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all


SDG 7 is of particular relevance to us in sub-Saharan Africa. Investing in clean, renewable energy sources is vitally important for combating climate change, while ensuring universal access to electricity is fundamental for providing the basic standard of living needed to provide good life opportunities.

The private sector is well established as the leading source of finance for power generation in most economies around the world (accounting for 80-100 per cent of power generation in developed markets). Thus, private investment is critical for reaching SDG 7, and it is vital that as much of this finance as possible is directed into clean energy infrastructure. In emerging markets, private investors provide around 45 per cent on average of total funding. .

Some of the most compelling investment opportunities can be found in renewable-energy projects in emerging markets, where growing demand for new sources of reliable, clean and affordable electricity is greatest. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), it is becoming increasingly common for governments to use independent power producers (IPPs) to build new generating capacity. This benefits the economy by attracting necessary capital and expertise and can also offer attractive rates of return for investors in IPPs. In addition, because payment is made under long-term power purchase agreements, this type of investment can also provide certainty for investors. While emerging markets offer the potential for high returns there are also added risks, including payment in volatile currencies, and less-developed transport infrastructure which adds to the cost of construction.

The UN believes that progress towards universal access to electricity is accelerating, indicating that this important target can be achieved with enough dedicated resources. However, much more needs to be done. The share of renewable sources in the total global energy supply only increased from 16.6 per cent in 2010 to 17.5 per cent in 2016. This was despite international finance to support clean energy in emerging markets almost doubling across the same period (increasing from $9.9bn to $18.6bn). Recently, costs have been falling rapidly, particularly for onshore wind and solar power, often making them more affordable, which should pave the way for increased investment. Achieving universal access to electricity globally is an important step, but this alone will not be enough to achieve SDG 7.

A shift away from fossil fuel-powered electricity generation, towards clean renewable energy sources, will be needed to achieve this. Investors still have significant opportunities to contribute to SDG 7 by increasing investment to clean energy projects.

Investment potential in sub-Saharan Africa


The total investment needed in the power sector to achieve and maintain universal access to power across emerging markets by 2030 is estimated to be approximately $9trn. Considering average private-sector participation rates of 45 per cent, the potential private sector investment opportunity in achieving universal access to power in emerging markets by 2030 is about $4.2trn.

According to the OECD, sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has the lowest energy access rates in the world. Roughly half the population, 600-million people, do not have access to electricity. Just over $146bn is required to achieve universal power access by 2030 in in five countries in sub-Saharan Africa - Kenya, Uganda, Nigeria, Ghana and Zambia alone. If international trends were followed almost $66bn of this would be expected to be contributed by the private sector.

While much of the developed world is substituting existing carbon energy sources for renewables, SSA is still ramping up its base load power to achieve universal access. Renewable energy plays a smaller role as most of the large scale developments are in gas and hydro, but the investment potential is significant. A recent Bloomberg New Energy Finance report indicates that $2.8bn was spent on renewables projects in sub-Saharan Africa (excluding South Africa) in 2018 .An interesting development is that smaller scale, off-grid renewable energy is making significant progress in reaching remote rural areas and this is largely being driven by private sector developers.

SSA has additional complexities which should be considered, not least of which is whether end users – and thus the countries - can afford to pay for the power. Of related concern are high levels of debt that have accumulated over the past decade leading to a recent appeal by African finance ministers to the IMF, World Bank and European Central Bank (ECB) for debt relief in relation to around $44bn in debt service payments this year. Covid-19 has accelerated matters but the broader debt levels have been increasing for some time.

As a potential solution, many sub-Saharan African countries have introduced legislation in the past decade to enable public private partnerships and are using this legislative framework to drive private investment in power. However, to date much of this has been investment in base load power rather than renewables.

Local financial markets


While there is no shortage of funding available for renewable energy, much of the recent debt financing in this sector has been provided by development finance institutions. There is room to increase the pool of lenders by structuring projects to facilitate the participation of commercial banks alongside DFIs. The World Bank and other multilaterals play an important role in this regard by enhancing borrower credit profiles through blended or viability gap financing and political risk mitigation.

Despite the progress to date, achieving universal power access is slow because utility scale IPPs are expensive in absolute amounts and take several years from bid stage to delivery of power. The high cost of developing new transmission lines to reach often remote areas which have renewable energy potential (for example, high solar radiance or wind occurrence) but are far from power demand centres further adds to the cost and timeline challenges of utility scale renewable energy projects. In addition, governments are still exposed to foreign currency risk as the financing markets require power purchase agreements to be indexed to the debt currency, which is invariably dollars.

With the exception of South Africa, local financial markets in SSA currently do not have the capacity to provide the long-term local currency finance required for infrastructure projects without incremental foreign currency risk. There is a drive to develop local capital markets to the point where they can finance projects in local currency, however this process is slow and will be set back further by current economic conditions. Recent successes in Cameroon and Kenya, where such structures are being developed, point the way to the future and should serve as successful templates for developers and lenders to emulate.

The off-grid or distributed power solutions mentioned earlier offer more immediate solutions for achieving universal power access in remote locations. These solutions typically make use of solar technology and are at the forefront of private sector renewable energy investments on the continent. On the back of electricity connections service providers have expanded their offering to include items like household appliances, internet connectivity, and financial services. All provided as part of a pay as you go package.

As these off-grid energy providers achieve scale they will increasingly look to consolidate operations and introduce strategic partners to take them to the next level – creating yet another avenue for private investors to play a role in achieving SDG 7.

As Covid-19 continues to unfold, and as everyone is focused on the immediate relief for those impacted and on the general economy, the subject of clean energy to support this agenda cannot be forgotten. Our motto should be to do no harm and to actively do good. The investments made today will preserve our planet for future generations.

Originally published on BizCommunity (Jun, 2020). You can read more here.

Business Strategies to Address Climate Change

Guest post by C2ES
Climate Solutions & Business Leadership
Originally published on C2ES website, (n.d.)

 
photo-1576045771676-7ac070c1ce72.jpg
 

Leading companies are taking action both inside and outside their fence lines to reduce their own emissions and become more resilient to inevitable climate impacts. C2ES has found that, internally, companies are seeking a deeper understanding of the risks and opportunities of a changing climate, and are taking steps to reduce their carbon footprints (the emissions from producing their products) and their handprints (emissions from the sales and use of their products). Externally, they are engaging suppliers, customers, key stakeholders and policymakers, and are publicly reporting emissions and energy-usage data, climate-related risks and management strategies. Companies are also demonstrating their commitment to climate action by partnering with other companies and stakeholders on solutions and by publicly supporting policies like the Paris Agreement.

Climate Action Plans

 The first step for many companies is to develop climate action plans across the company and for individual business units. The components of a climate action plan depend on the type of company and the goals it wants to achieve, but every company faces a few general decisions, such as:

  • whether the plan is designed through a “top-down” or “bottom-up” process

  • whether to establish one or more targets – and if so, of what type and how

  • how targets fit in with other environmental management activities

  • to what extent the plan features market mechanisms such as internal carbon price and/or and external carbon offsets

  • how to use research and development resources and other means to drive innovation.

Once targets are established, they can drive innovation within the company, spurring internal programs and products that can help the company meet its goals. Sometimes the mere existence of emissions or energy use data generates interest and ideas for improvements that turn out to be profitable on their own.

Goals and Targets

A growing number of companies have voluntarily adopted climate-related targets. The type of target an individual company chooses depends on its products and production methods, policy environment, and business models. Some targets focus on reducing greenhouse gases, and others on energy use. Some serve as absolute limits, and others are relative to production levels and revenues. Goals and targets can also apply to supply chain purchases or use of company products.

Nearly 300 companies have set a greenhouse gas emission reduction target “in line with climate science.” More than 100 have set goals to be powered by 100 percent renewable energy. Other companies, such as Microsoft, are adopting operational carbon neutrality goals.  Some companies purchase carbon offsets from projects such as reduced deforestation to help achieve their emission goals more cost-effectively.

Companies have found that addressing climate also makes good business sense. Greenhouse gas targets have helped them save money, generally through improvements in energy and operational efficiency. They have also seen reduced production costs and enhanced product sales, making them more competitive.

Companies have also found these internal policies help prepare them for future regulation by investing in emissions reductions now. They’ve also protected and enhanced their reputation with customers and shareholders.

Internal Carbon Pricing

One business strategy gaining traction among leading businesses is internal carbon pricing, which assigns a price to carbon emissions attributable to the business. More than 1,200 companies worldwide are either pursuing internal carbon pricing or preparing to do so in the coming two years—up 23 percent from 2015.

Companies that establish a corporate carbon price assign a monetary value to CO2 emissions associated with a business activity. This price signal is factored into investment decisions, providing an incentive for the company to move from emissions-intensive programs and products to low-carbon, climate-resilient alternatives.

Nearly 300 companies have set a greenhouse gas emission reduction target in line with climate science. More than 100 have set goals to be powered by 100 percent renewable energy.

Energy Efficiency

Improved energy efficiency has emerged as a key component of corporate climate change strategies. Companies participating in the global EP 100 initiative pledge to double their energy productivity (dollar of output per unit of energy), which has the potential to save more than $2 trillion globally by 2030.

Leading firms that give greater attention to energy efficiency report billions of dollars in savings and millions of tons of avoided greenhouse gas emissions. Efficiency strategies can encompass internal operations, supply chains, products and services, and cross-cutting issues.

Companies that take on carbon footprinting and reduction strategies quickly come to see their energy use in a whole new light. When companies calculate their carbon footprint, they typically find that their energy consumption accounts for the great majority of their directly measurable emissions impact. Suddenly, energy shifts from perhaps a small cost item to the biggest piece of their carbon footprint. Viewed from this perspective, energy efficiency becomes a sustainability imperative.

Corporate energy efficiency strategies are most effective when:

  • Efficiency is an integral part of corporate strategic planning and risk assessment;

  • leadership and organizational support are real and sustained;

  • the company has SMART (specific, measurable, accountable, realistic, and time-bound) energy efficiency goals;

  • the strategy relies on a robust tracking and measurement system;

  • the organization puts substantial resources into efficiency;

  • the energy efficiency strategy shows results; and

  • the company effectively communicates efficiency results internally and externally.

Innovative Finance

Companies are also employing a wide range of innovative financial tools to achieve their climate and energy goals:

  • Energy producers and utilities often offer their customers on-bill financing, which allows a homeowner or commercial building owner to invest in energy efficiency improvements, with payments added on to their utility bills. This removes the high upfront costs of efficiency improvements, and encourages building owners to work directly with utilities on efficiency projects.

  • Large energy buyers also participate in green pricing programs (also known as green tariffs). U.S. utilities that offer these programs allow eligible customers to buy energy at a premium from a renewable project directly operated by the utility, or by issuing a renewable energy certificate (REC) from a renewable project. This allows businesses to use sources like wind, solar, low-impact hydro, biomass, landfill gas, and geothermal.

  • Some companies and banks are tapping into the rise in investor demand to finance environmentally sound projects by issuing green bonds or sustainability bonds. Green bonds act as a vehicle for institutional investors seeking to put their capital in projects that address climate change, and help drive innovation and development of low-carbon products. Like conventional bonds, green bonds can be issued by a corporate, bank, or government entity. The debt insurance by investors means that the companies do not need to tap into their limited credit lines or cash reserves to fund renewable or energy efficiency projects. While green bonds help support projects with a positive environmental impact, sustainability bonds work like green bonds, but also focus on the social impact.

Originally published on C2ES (n.d.). You can read more here.